logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.10 2018고단834
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C is the representative director of the KUE in the 6th floor of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D Building, and the defendant is a person who has established and operated the KUE with C while using the position of the president.

The Defendant recruited to attract investment funds from the office in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City branch office, and the Defendant and C agreed to hold an investment explanation meeting to the effect that “The Bank of Korea sells the Pium Potium caps, the UN pact, etc., and if one unit is purchased in the amount of KRW 6.6 million per share, it shall be converted into money and paid in installments in the amount of KRW 2.5 million per share, and during the existence of a company as a class allowance, it shall be paid in the amount of KRW 50,00 per share, KRW 10,00 per class, KRW 30,000 per class, KRW 60,000 per class, and KRW 60,000 per class.”

However, even if the Plaintiff did not receive any revenue from the above business revenue as well as any other revenue or property at the time, and even if the Plaintiff received investments from investors, the Plaintiff did not have the ability to rapidly increase the revenue within a short period by using the investment fund. Therefore, the Plaintiff had no choice but to take a method of repaying the total amount of the investment fund or the excess amount to the existing investors in consecutive order by using the investment fund kept by priority investors. Under such business structure, as long as the new investors continuously increase in water supply under the business structure, there was no intention or ability to pay the agreed high-rate allowance to the investors, as it is anticipated that the agreed high-rate allowance would not be paid.

Nevertheless, on September 20, 2008, the Defendant, in collusion with C on September 20, 2008, deceiving victim F and received 4.20,000 won from the injured party under the name of investment money from the office in the Seoul Special Metropolitan Office for the Co., Ltd., which received 4.2 million won from the injured party from February 25, 2009, by deceiving four victims, such as the list of crimes in attached Form from February 25, 2009.

arrow