logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.03.07 2013노3683
횡령
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Article 355 of the Criminal Code is applicable to the entry in the column of application of statutes of the lower judgment.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that Defendant A received from the victim the down payment pursuant to the sales contract for Edabnb (hereinafter “Danbnb”) owned by Defendant A, and at the same time, Defendant A owned the down payment. Thus, even if the Defendants consumed it, the crime of embezzlement is not constituted. However, the court below found Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, and there is an error of law by mistake of facts.

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the victim was asked for the verification of authenticity and paid 5 million won to the defendant A with the security deposit for the return of the above Dan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that there is no reason for the appeal, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that it is obvious that the entry in the column of application of the lower judgment is an error under Articles 35

arrow