The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too large.

2. Although the judgment of the court below has a hearing impairment on the defendant, considering all of the circumstances such as the fact that the sentence was determined by the court below through mitigation of deaf-mutes, the area where the defendant changes the form and quality (2,80 square meters) was considerably wide, the defendant's restoration order from 2017 to the original state was alleged to have restored the scarma which is not a tree but a tree after the closing of argument in the trial, and the fact that the defendant submitted photographs to the original state after being ordered to restore to the original state from 2017, and the various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument in this case

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.