logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.22 2014고합579
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강요행위등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above three years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등) 피고인들은 2014. 2. 초순경 불상지에서 가출한 D(여, 14세)에게 성매매를 한 후 성매수남들로부터 받은 화대를 1/3씩 나눠가질 것을 제안을 한 후 이에 D이 동의하자 그 무렵 스마트폰 채팅 앱인 즐톡을 통해 성명불상의 성매수남을 구한 후 D로 하여금 성매수남으로부터 화대 15만원 상당을 받고 성을 파는 행위를 하도록 알선하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange the purchase of child or juvenile sex.

2. On February 1, 2014, the Defendants heard that they would no longer have been able to get sexual traffic from D who engaged in sexual traffic as stated in paragraph (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and expressed the attitude that they would have been able to get the victim to go to the fry in the vicinity of the Mabbry E located in Daegu Northern-gu, and expressed a bath that “I saw that we would have never come to go to the fry,” and Defendant A threatened the victims of drinking sexual traffic by threatening “ how we will come to fry,” and let the victims of drinking sexual traffic receive an amount equivalent to 150,000 won from the fry of the fry and the fry of the fry of the fry and the fry.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make the victim, who is a child or juvenile, to become the counterpart in buying sex of the child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Testimony of witness G;

1. Each statement of the witness D and H in the second trial records (the contents of the statement of D, which is a juvenile with sexual traffic, are consistent and specific, as well as consistent with the respective statements of G and H, and no other circumstance exists that makes a false statement otherwise. The defendants demanded not only their father (H to find D) but also their father (it also demanded money to find D) while the defendants are moving into D, and one-third of money is divided.

arrow