1. The defendant, including the plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiffs, shall set forth in attached Form 2 compensation No. 3.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Relationship 1 of the Parties: Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Appointors (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”).

2) The apartment of Ansan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment of the Plaintiff”).

A total of 45 households are divided owners of the 45 units. The Selection G and H share 1/2 shares each of the 1/2 units. The Selection Tho Lake, Lho Lake, Mho, N, O, P, and Q 2 units each own the total of six units of the Selection-ho Lake, Q 23 units actually reside in the apartment of this case, and the Selection-ho Lake and S. The specific ownership status and dwelling status of each unit of the plaintiffs are as shown in attached Table 2. The plaintiff asserted that the Selection-ho subparagraph 2 is residing in the plaintiff apartment X. However, even if it is examined closely, there is no evidence to acknowledge that W residing in the plaintiff apartment of this case. 2) The defendant is the building of the 10th floor, the 19th ground and the 31st unit of the apartment of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant apartment site of this case" of this case, see the following apartment site of this case, hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant apartment site of this case").

B. On January 200, the current plaintiff apartment building of the 20th apartment is a completed apartment building of the 20th floor and its main window is opened to the south side.

【In the absence of a dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 7 and 9 (including the number of branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply)’s appraisal result, appraiser V (hereinafter “appraisal”), the result of the inquiry and inquiry into the appraiser of this court (hereinafter the above appraisal result and the result of inquiry about the fact) and the result of on-site verification conducted by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The gist of the 1st Plaintiffs’ assertion as to whether liability for damages occurred due to the infringement of the right to sunshine occurred, and the construction of apartment complexes by the Defendant, thereby infringing the right to sunshine, the right to mutual assistance, and the right to privacy.