(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.04 2015노1963 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.04 2015노1963

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

The judgment below

Of the judgment of the court below, the part on the crime No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

The first crime and the first crime in the judgment of the court below.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The sentence (No. 1 and No. 2) of the lower court (No. 2: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, confiscation (No. 2), and confiscation (No. 2): Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and confiscation (No. 1)) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case committed two times by the Defendant: (a) the mother of the victim D, who is the mother of the victim, her mother, her mother, was faced with the body of the victim once and the head was faced with about two weeks; (b) the victim’s head was collected once and snicked; (c) the victim’s head was cut off once and snicked; (d) the victim’s head was collected at one time; and (e) the victim’s head was flicked to the victim for about three weeks in line with the victim’s left-hand body; and (e) the victim was injured by two open skins, which require two weeks in need of medical treatment (the crime of violation of Article 1 of the judgment of the court below); and (e) when the victim’s spouse, E, she was installed with the victim’s flick in its original form, which is a dangerous thing with her head’s symptoms; and (e) the victim’s flicked the victim’s hand on the right part of the victim; and (f) the victim’s 2)

(B) The crime of Article 2-2 of the original judgment is deemed to be inevitable, while the defendant commits the crime of Article 2-2 of the original judgment during the period of suspension of execution due to a separate crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the sentence of sentence is inevitable. The sentence of the original judgment (one year and six months of imprisonment) against the above crime cannot be deemed to be excessively unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

However, the Defendant recognized and opposed to the instant crime, and is in the position to support his spouse E and her children, and agreed with E at the time of the trial, and the family and branch members of the Defendant, including the victims, want to take the Defendant’s preference.

(b) other.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2020.04.10 2019노4213

-의정부지방법원 2019.01.08 2018노1819

-서울북부지방법원 2015.04.10 2015노136

-수원지방법원 2020.06.18 2020노1632

-수원지방법원 2014.07.25 2014노1856