1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons why this part of the disposition is stated are as follows: (a) the court added the phrase "(hereinafter referred to as this case's injury") to the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance," and (b) the second part of the second part "(hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of this case") to the phrase "(i.e., the decision corresponding to the person of distinguished service to the State, because the plaintiff is dissatisfied with the decision corresponding to the requirements of the person of distinguished service to the State," and (iii) the part is identical to the corresponding part of the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case's decision corresponding to the requirements of the person of distinguished service to the State. Therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2)

(hereinafter the meaning of the abbreviationd language used in this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance). 2. Whether the disposition of this case is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was broken down by the left-hand shoulder around August 8, 199, which was about four years prior to entering the plaintiff, and entered the Army on September 8, 2003, and received the education and training of this case, the above left-hand shoulder, which had already been abandoned before entering the Army, was broken down, and the body was laid down on the right shoulder and left-hand shoulder.

The plaintiff's main rank is the left-hand shoulder of the plaintiff's main rank, and the plaintiff's left-hand shoulder is the plaintiff's shoulder that occurred during military education and training, or the existing wounds have deteriorated above the natural progress speed due to education and training, so the plaintiff is a person of distinguished service to the State.

Therefore, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

B. Since the attached text of the judgment of the court of first instance of the relevant statutes is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of

C. Facts 1) - The Plaintiff’s past history, etc. - the Plaintiff has broken down several times in the process of cutting away from stairs or skiing skis, etc. before entering around August 199 (the first half of 16 years old and 8 years old at that time).

- The plaintiff on April 24, 2003.