The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In light of the overall circumstances of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the circumstances such as the defendant's age and family relation, family relation, character and conduct, environment, means and method of crime, motive and circumstance of crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is judged to be appropriate, and the defendant's allegation of unfair sentencing is unreasonable because it is not reasonable because the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is judged to be reasonable, and the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, because it is not reasonable because it is not reasonable to deem that the defendant's partial payment of money to the victim is not for recovery of damage. The defendant's payment of money to the victim is a means of acquiring the money continuously from the victim who has already been mistaken, and the defendant's continuous payment of money to the victim is not for recovery of damage.

If so, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, the lower court’s judgment’s statement on May 30, 2013 is clear that it is an error of “ around May 30, 2012,” and thus, ex officio correction is made pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.