A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2014, at around 02:10, the Defendant reported that he was arrested by a taxi engineer and a scambling in front of the “scambbed YYYYYYYDDDDDD”) located in Busan, as the superintendent of Busan, and reported that he was arrested by a taxi engineer and 112. On the one hand, the Defendant heard that the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to BB zone, dispatched to the said B zone, returned home to the said C, she was called the “weaked,” she was called the said C, and she took a bath, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the report by 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. Investigation report (limited to the attachment of photographs damaged by the victim), application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties).

2. The confession of the decision of sentence, the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind of imprisonment or suspended sentence, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties;