The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the number of damages in this case is relatively small; (b) most of the damaged items were returned to the victim; (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim to have favorable circumstances, such as the victim’s desire to have been punished several times due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.; (d) the Defendant was sentenced to three years due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.; and (e) again repeatedly committed the instant crime during the period of repeated offense after the execution of the sentence was completed; and (e) other all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.