logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단4497
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on August 7, 2015. On October 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Western District Court on the Seoul Northern District Court and completed the execution of the sentence on April 19, 2017.

1. On July 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven an E-7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.083% in the section of about 5 K KK from the 104 east-gu Seoul Dobong-gu to the 851 Dowing Station, which is the Defendant’s residence in Gyeonggi-gu, the head of Gyeonggi-do, the Gyeonggi-do Free Trade Zone; (b) around 05:10, the Defendant driven an E-7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.083% in blood.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a KS7 car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On July 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as stated in paragraph 1 of around 05:10, and driven it along the two-lanes between the two-lanes from the Dowing Station of Dobong-gu Seoul to the 851 Dowing Station of the Dowing Station of Dobong-gu Seoul.

At the same time, there was an intersection in which signal apparatus was installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by emphasizing the situation of the front door to the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle and safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim F.(59) who was driving from the new service distance to the left-hand turn on the left-hand turn due to the negligence of violating the signal while neglecting the left-hand turn, while driving the vehicle in the opposite direction of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, and was driven by the victim F.(59) who was driving from the new service distance to the left-hand turn on the left-hand turn.

In this respect.

arrow