1. Of the instant lawsuit, the penalty surcharge stated in [Attachment 1] No. 7 of the [Attachment 1] No. 1 List 7 is imposed on the Plaintiff-based taxi partnership company.

Details of the disposition

Plaintiff

The ero-si limited partnership company (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff ero-si”) operated a taxi transport business with each place of business located in 33-2 U.S.-dong 30, U.S.-dong 30, U.S., and Plaintiff ero-si.g., Plaintiff ero-si 12, and Plaintiff ero-si passenger, respectively, on October 7, 201, pursuant to the proviso to Article 10(1) of the former Passenger Transport Service Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013) and Article 33 of the Enforcement Rule of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter referred to as the “passenger Transport Service Act”). The main office and the incidental facilities of the passenger transport business plan were modified to 144, U.S. e.g., the air transport business plan.

On August 29, 2011, and October 14, 2011, the Gongju-si notified that each of the above reports was accepted on August 29, 201.

As Articles 5 through 7 of the Special Act on the Establishment, etc. of Sejong Special Self-Governing City (amended by Act No. 10419, Dec. 27, 2010; hereinafter referred to as the " Sejong City Act") enter into force on July 1, 2012, the former Chungcheongnam-do Council member of Chungcheongnam-do, the former Cheongnam-do, the former Cheongbuk-do Council member of Chungcheongnam-do, the former Cheongbuk-do Dasan-si, the former Dasan-do Dasan-ri, the former Dosan-ri, the Busan-do Dasan-ri, the Busan-do Dasan-ri, the Busan-do Do Dasan-ri, the former Do Do Dasan-ri, the former Do Do Dasan-ri and the former Do Do ri-ri, the former Do Do ri-ri and the former 5th Do Do ri-ri and the former 5th Do Do ri-ri-ri.

The defendant on May 20, 2014, Article 6 of the Sejong City Act, Article 10 of the Passenger Transport Act, and the Enforcement Rule of the Passenger Transport Act.