logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.04.14 2015구합377
농지보전부담금부과처분취소청구
Text

1. The Defendant imposed farmland preservation charges of KRW 22,061,903, and KRW 320 on the Plaintiffs on November 7, 2014, 19,916, and94.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiffs are co-implementers of the development project in this case, which is implemented at the Naju-dong and the Haju-gun Woo-ririririwon in accordance with the Special Act on the Construction and Support of Innovation Cities Following Relocation of Public Agencies (hereinafter "the Urban Development Project in this case").

B. 1) The Plaintiffs deemed to have obtained permission to divert farmland upon obtaining approval for the implementation plan of the instant development project as prescribed by Article 2008-91 of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation public notice on March 4, 2008, the Defendant on June 25, 2008 imposed farmland preservation charges of KRW 17,783,554,680 (hereinafter “the initial disposition”) on farmland preservation charges, such as the entry in Table 1, on farmland in the development project area and expected to be used for any purpose other than farmland (hereinafter “the initial disposition”).

(2) On July 16, 2010, the Plaintiffs paid farmland preservation charges to the Defendant joining the Defendant, who was entrusted with the receipt of farmland preservation charges pursuant to relevant laws and regulations, on or before July 2008. (2) The Plaintiffs obtained approval for the modification of the implementation plan of the instant development project under the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs Notice No. 2010-936 on December 16, 2010, and the Defendant made a decision to additionally impose farmland preservation charges of KRW 2,210,78,120 on the Plaintiffs on October 24, 2012, as indicated in Table 1, and simultaneously changed farmland preservation charges of KRW 19,94,342,80 (hereinafter “the first increase”). The Plaintiffs paid the said additional farmland preservation charges to the Defendant.

3) The Plaintiffs obtained approval to change the implementation plan of the instant development project from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced on December 6, 2013 to increase the farmland size. The Defendant, on November 7, 2014, rendered a decision to additionally impose farmland preservation charges of KRW 2,067,560,520 as stated in the Table 1, and at the same time, changed farmland preservation charges of KRW 22,061,903,320 (hereinafter referred to as “II”).

arrow