beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The public officials in charge of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, as a result of an on-site investigation into B mountain workers and council members (hereinafter “instant medical care institution”) operated by the Plaintiff from February 26, 2010 to March 3, 2010, discovered that the instant convalescent hospital unfairly claims for medical care benefit costs of KRW 32,720,250 as follows from February 1, 2007 to November 30, 209.
According to the detailed matters on the criteria and methods for the application of the Medical Care Benefits Act (Notice No. 2007-3 of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, January 23, 2007) for a claim for violation of the guidelines for the recognition of an operation for an operation for the use of a personal assistance tape 1, it is recognized that the operation for an operation for the use of a personal assistance tape is conducted only when the main amount of the divesium or the amount of the divesium or the amount of the divesium is confirmed as the result of the divesology examination (hereinafter “instant recognition criteria”), and where the level of the divesium pressure is less than 120ccH2O.
However, even if the result of the epidemian test did not meet the criteria for recognition of this case, the Plaintiff filed a claim for hospitalization fees, anesthesia fees, and surgery fees by modifying the data as a result of the test by changing the name and the date of the test as a result of the examination of other patients meeting the criteria for recognition of this case.
29,102,700 Alternative Medicines and False Claim Castro (A07204491/282-283) were used, and claimed as Carnastro (W0028081/453-457 won) (W091,765 won) (W028081/453-457 won) (W028081/457 won) or carnastro (A0720491/282-283 won).
(2,635,620 won) 3,727,385 (2) on April 8, 201, the Minister of Health and Welfare rendered the Plaintiff a disposition of suspending the business of a medical care institution for 40 days (hereinafter “instant disposition of suspending business”). The Defendant was paid to the Plaintiff on May 2, 2011.