logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.24 2016가단507852
부당이득금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,017,580 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 5, 2016 to July 24, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, an insurance solicitor Co., Ltd., which is an insurance company C, is a person working for the position of the branch office, and the Defendant is working for the same branch office of the insurance company as a designer.

is a retired person.

B. Through the Plaintiff’s or the Plaintiff’s spouse D, each insurance contract was concluded between the Defendant and the Defendant’s or the Defendant’s spouse E (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

(1) Samsung Bio-resources (E) (E) 859,800 won (E) 859,800 won (E) 859,800 won, and 2) 4,759,413 won (E) 4,759,413 won 59,359,213 won (B-2) 5,359,213 won (E) 1.7.9.7.97.9 (E. 57,320 won) 208,8200 won (E) 4,759,413 won, 59,213

C. The Plaintiff paid the premium following the conclusion of the instant insurance contract (1) through (5). The amount of the premium paid by the Plaintiff is identical to that of the Plaintiff’s insurance premium in the foregoing insurance statement.

From the beginning of conflicts between the plaintiff and the defendant with regard to the settlement of insurance premiums and credit card payments, the defendant paid some of the insurance premiums of this case, and the details thereof are the same as the defendant's insurance premiums in the above insurance statement.

On the other hand, the defendant raised the issue of ①, ② that there is no signature of the insured in the subscription form for insurance with respect to the insurance, and ② that the insurance contract was null and void, and accordingly, the defendant paid the total amount of the insurance premium already paid in relation to the insurance.

arrow