The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

except that this judgment.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of 10,000 won and fine of 60,000 won imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is not easy to obstruct a police officer's legitimate execution of duties, such as taking breath, etc. of a police officer who arrived at a beauty room upon receiving a report as a result of interference with his/her duties, on the grounds that the defendant was dissatisfied with the problem of providing beauty services, by finding in the beauty room operated by the victim and his/her employees and obstructing his/her duties by exercising tangible power, booming a bather, booming him/her, etc., and threatening him/her to do so while telephone conversations with the victim. In particular, the defendant was arrested on May 17, 2015 on the day of his/her release on the charge that he/she interfered with the victim's business on the day of his/her release, and was arrested on the victim's beauty room on the day of his/her release, and thus obstructing the victim's disturbance and his/her employees by displaying objections about the transfer report, and the crime is considerably not sufficient, and the defendant was punished prior to criminal punishment, such as mental anxiety, etc.

However, it is difficult to view that the Defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, thereby contravening his mistake, that the Defendant agreed with the victim who is the owner of the beauty room business, that the Defendant did not have exercised serious physical and physical assault in the course of obstructing the beauty room business several times, and that it is difficult to view that the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is also significant. The Defendant has an opportunity to return his mistake through confinement life exceeding three months, and that the Defendant does not visit again to the beauty room in the future.