beta
Text
1. Defendant Seodaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City: KRW 7,010,302 to Plaintiff A; KRW 5,231,555 to Plaintiff B; and Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
Reasons
1. The basic facts D, Plaintiff B, and C provided real estate owned by the Defendants (the head of the local government as the project implementer, but the local government and its head were not distinguished for convenience, and the real estate owned by the Defendant Seodaemun-gu and Defendant Eunpyeong-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Seodaemun-gu”) for public activities executed by the Defendants (the head of the local government as the project implementer and the head
On November 15, 2003, Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (building) on April 4, 2005, 2005, the project implementer’s project implementer’s project implementer’s project implementer’s project implementer’s project implementer’s project implementer’s Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seodaemun-gu H (land, building) around November 12, 2007 to specially supply the apartment land to the persons who provided real estate for each public project pursuant to the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Rules on National Housing Supply to the Seoul Metropolitan Government Removal, etc. on Nov. 19, 2006.
E. E.S. Corporation entrusted by the Defendants: ① entered into a sales contract with respect to the Plaintiff B and M apartment 1205 Dong 601 (2) with respect to the Plaintiff B and M apartment 915 Dong 1202 (2) with respect to the land size 56.97 square meters; ③ Plaintiff C and M apartment 1203 Dong 203 square meters (53.86 square meters of land size).
Plaintiff
A has succeeded to the rights and obligations of the buyer in the sale contract from D, and obtained approval from the EP Corporation.
The plaintiffs paid full the sales price under each sales contract.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 3, and 5 evidence 4, 7, 16, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 8, and 9 evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 1-1, 4, 5-1, 3-1 to 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The sales contract concluded between the plaintiffs' assertion and EP Corporation is the Gu before it was amended by Act No. 8665 of Oct. 17, 2007.