beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
All applications filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for fraud, and on August 14, 2009, the Defendant was released from the execution of the remaining punishment on August 14, 2009.
[2012 Highest 2056] On February 2, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s H Co., Ltd. office operated by the victim G in Gyeonggi-si F, the end of the horse game, stating, “The employee has a discount benefit of KRW 5 million with respect to the vehicle produced by the company. If an employee of the first employee exchanges a vehicle with another vehicle, he/she may have the vehicle covered by the accident and that of KRW 5 million if he/she exchanges it with another vehicle.”
However, even if the defendant did not know that he had been employed and received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the vehicle through the I staff.
Around March 25, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, obtained KRW 2 million from the victim with the account in the name of the Defendant (Account Number K), KRW 5 million from July 9, 201, and KRW 2 million from July 13, 201, respectively, and acquired KRW 9 million from the victim with the transfer of KRW 2 million from July 13, 201.
[2012 Highest 2293]
1. On March 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the Victim L at the main point located in Changwon-si M in Changwon-si, 2010, stating that “The amount invested in the owner of a building with a cost of 4 billion won in Gangnam is to be paid to the extent of KRW 60 million so that the said person can sell the building in Gangnam. If the Defendant wishes to recover the money, he/she shall receive a loan to the extent of KRW 60 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won
However, in fact, the Defendant did not know the owner of the building in Gangnam and did not have invested money, and help the Defendant not keep the record of the loan.