All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is attending the Department C No. 17 of the Department C and the victim (hereinafter “the victim’s name omitted”) is the Defendant’s boarding during the 16th class session of the same department.

In 2017, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant is a person attending a drinking house during the course of the 16th class line of the Korean Department of Study at B University C, which is located in the Chungcheongbuk-do D around 2017, the Defendant said that “The 000 and the 00th class of the Frith class” means “A, who is a person attending a drinking house during the course of the 1

However, there was no fact that the victim was an employee of an entertainment drinking house.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts about the victim.

B. On December 2017, 2017, the Defendant, who committed the first police officer, committed a crime, thereby damaging the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out that the victim is an employee of an entertainment drinking house as described in paragraph (1), among those having male and female H and her friendship I in the “G” week located in the “G” located in the “G” located in the Hanbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, etc.

C. On December 19, 2017, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “K, the same academic motive in the coffee shop located in the J of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, as described in paragraph (1), is an employee of an entertainment drinking house.”

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the statement on the withdrawal of a complaint submitted by the victim to this court, the victim can be found to have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on February 20, 2019, which was after the indictment of this case was instituted.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, this case.