logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2015.11.04 2015가합100166
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 25, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant A entered into an insurance contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A as the insured, the Defendant A as the beneficiary of the insurance contract listed in attached Table 1(1) (hereinafter “instant No. 1 insurance contract”), and the insurance contract listed in paragraph (2) of the same Table (hereinafter “instant No. 2 insurance contract”), respectively.

B. Defendant B received Defendant B’s insurance proceeds from July 4, 2013 to July 24, 2013, as indicated in the attached Table 2, received hospitalized treatment for a total of 69 days from that time during the period from that time to September 5, 2014, for 21 days, under the name of illness, such as brain dead, at C Hospital located in Bupyeong-si, as well as from that time during which he received hospitalized treatment for 21 days. Defendant A received KRW 8,116,99 in total from the Plaintiff according to each insurance contract of this case.

C. Defendant A’s insurance contract details, etc. 1) between February 13, 2009, including each of the instant insurance contracts, and June 26, 2013, Defendant A entered into a total of 14 insurance contracts with Defendant B as the insured as shown in the attached Form 3, including the details of the conclusion of the insurance contract, and among them, the insurance contracts maintained until now are five (5) items. Meanwhile, upon entering into each of the instant insurance contracts by Defendant A, the monthly insurance premium to be paid by Defendant A as of June 26, 2013 was calculated by adding up at least 484,025 won among the insurance contracts listed in the attached Forms 3 through 14.

This became the subject of this.

[Based on recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of this court's order to submit each financial transaction information to AI life insurance company, Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. ( June 9, 2015), LIG damage insurance company, and AIG damage insurance company, as a result of the whole oral argument

2. Defendant A, the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, did not have any reason to double purchase a large number of guaranteed insurance policies, but on June 25, 2013.

arrow