A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) provides that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Crop vehicle.

At around 02:30 on January 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car, and proceeded to the intersection without signal apparatus 28:28:5 in the direction of the police hospital in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, to the left side of the said car, with the front part of the halog car driven by D entering the intersection late from the left side of the road in the direction of the police hospital, while driving the said car in the direction of the police hospital, the Defendant got a back part of the left side of the said halog car, which was driven by the victim F (36 years old) who was driven by the Defendant at the right side of the car, after receiving the part of the f.26,048 won for repair, such as the exchange of the f.26,048 won for the victim’s taxi, and without immediately stopping it.

2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on a sound driving) continued to drive the said Epic car after the occurrence of the same accident as described in paragraph (1) and, around 02:36, the Defendant continued to drive the said Epic car with the Olympic 43-ro 20-o, Songpa-gu Seoul Olympic Games at a 0.105% alcohol concentration, the Defendant continued to drive the said Epic at an unsected speed in the direction of the Olympic Epic Den

In this case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of motor vehicles to see the front side and to accurately operate the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this and neglecting it, was driving by the victim H(the age of 44) who was standing in the front direction of the signal in the front direction due to negligence that neglected to operate the steering direction and operation system, and failed to properly operate the steering direction and operation system, and was driving by the victim H(the age of 44). The Defendant left the front direction of the car in front of it.