logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.09.27 2013고단1731
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to two years in Seoul Southern District Court on May 4, 201 to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence in Daejeon Prison on March 22, 2013. In addition, on February 16, 2009, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor by the Suwon District Court on February 16, 2009.

Defendant

B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on April 25, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon District Court on February 20, 2013. On July 22, 2004, on July 22, 2004, there was one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Theft in the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam Branch on July 24, 2004, and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. and two years of suspended execution.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants were able to commit larceny in order to raise living expenses with the gap they came to know in the Daejeon Correctional Institution.

At around 14:00 on June 21, 2013, the Defendants: (a) confirmed that there is no person to divide the first class of the victim E, and (b) confirmed that there is no person to divide the first class; (c) Defendant A used money and valuables equivalent to KRW 2,300,000,000,000 in the market value, such as the market value of the victim’s possession, which is equivalent to KRW 90,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, and 300,000,000,000 won.

From around that time to July 13, 2013, Defendants stolen money and valuables worth KRW 17,870,000 in total on seven occasions habitually, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Each statement of H, I, J, E, and K;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

arrow