1. The liability for damages caused by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s accident on April 23, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 23, 2016, the Defendant visited the Plaintiff’s home to take the goods returned to the Plaintiff’s home, and then asked the Plaintiff’s pet dog (cosectel) that became a crepan in the middle crepan in the crepan of the heat.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Defendant suffered damage to the integrity of the following bridges, which requires stability in the daily lives and observation of the upper state due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's damage liability against the defendant due to the accident of this case does not exceed 379,980 won in total, 79,980 won for the damages of this case and 300,000 won.

In this regard, the defendant claims against the plaintiff for the payment of 5,068,720 won, including 272,320 won, 854,90 won from the lost income, 1,441,500 won from the substitute vehicle, 2,500 won, and 5,068,720 won, and damages for delay.

B. According to the facts of recognition of the Plaintiff’s liability for damages, the Plaintiff’s pet dog asked the Defendant, and thereby, the Defendant may recognize the fact that the pet dog suffered from injury, such as impairment of satisfy, etc. on the right side. Thus, the Plaintiff, the occupant of the above pet dog, is liable to compensate the Defendant for damages caused by the instant accident pursuant to Article 759(1) of the Civil Act. (2) According to the evidence No. 3, according to the scope of compensation for damages from April 27, 2016 to May 16, 2016, the Defendant was admitted to have paid medical expenses of KRW 79,980,00, who was admitted to the department of emergency medical treatment at the Insaturgian Hospital at Incheon University from April 27, 2016 to May

Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s treatment from June 27, 2016 to treat the suffering from the fear of the dog caused by the instant accident and the suffering from suffering from an uneasiness.