The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for four months, the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for four months, and the taking of sexual assault treatment lectures for forty hours) is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the Defendant; (b) the agreement with the victim was favorable; (c) the victim’s age is the age of the victim; and (d) the Defendant was punished for a public performance obscenity crime in 2009.

In full view of all the above sentencing factors, the Defendant’s age, sex, career, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading up to the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other matters on the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments on the change of the circumstances, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, since there is no change of circumstances to be considered in the trial.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.