beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bmer truck truck truck truck truck vehicle.
On November 15, 2016, the Defendant, at around 17:50, operated the above cargo vehicle on the national highway No. 4, prior to the Yongcheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-do, and continued the above cargo vehicle on the ground of the national highway No. 4, prior to the Yongsan-do, in order to proceed as the opposite line.
Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to make a internship at the point where the internship is permitted.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the collision between the victim C (51) who was flicked along the two lanes in the opposite vehicle line due to the negligence of the central line, and the victim C (51) who was flicked along the two lanes, and the front side of the said cargo vehicle and the front side of the cargo vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as spinal pressure pressure, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A traffic accident report, photograph description, and report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;
1. A report on internal investigation:
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;
1. Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.
3. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant caused a traffic accident by negligence while driving a central line, resulting in the victim’s injury, and the degree of the injury is heavy.
On the other hand, however, the victim does not want to be punished for the defendant, because the defendant was unable to pay a certain amount of money to the victim due to a driver's economic situation.
The defendant's vehicle is also covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the defendant has committed the crime in this case, and his mistake is divided.
Defendant.