logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.09 2018고단1237
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with sod motor vehicle B.

On January 31, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 02:00, and proceeded to turn to the left at the right angle of the front line from the front line of the police station in the middle line.

In this case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle, to live well on the right and the right, and to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, even though the defendant did not properly look at the front side and the left and the right and the right and the right and the signal of the defendant's moving direction is a red signal, the defendant took part of the victim C(59) driving D taxi in front of the driver's driving of the victim C(59 years old) who was driving on the opposite side from the backside to the opposite side by leaving the above three-distance intersection by the left and left turn.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the above victim C, such as a thring of 14 weeks of cultivation, an open upper part of 2 feet, brain-proof, etc., and the injury to the victim E (V, 38 years of age) who was on board the above taxi, for approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment, such as 2 feet, cage cages of cage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement related to each traffic accident in C and E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographss by cutting off on the spot and black stuffs images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against C with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Social services and.

arrow