beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, each of the above two years against the Defendants from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
J has established and operated L, a corporation located in the Hahbuk-gun, Inc. from June 201 to June 201, and Defendant A is a person who entered the corporation from April 2012 to work as a corporation.
Defendants, either directly or through M of the management directors of L, Co., Ltd., Ltd., on September 2012, 2012, have urban-type residential housing in the wife population of L Co., Ltd.
In order to obtain five loans for the construction cost as a substitute, it is necessary to prepare a lease contract as a lessee on the house and lend the loan in the name of the lessee, and dispose of the house received from the bank on the face of the loan from the bank and to repay all the loan by disposing of the house as a substitute.
Upon receipt of the proposal of "," the fact was that there was no fact that the deposit was paid for the lease on the above urban residential house, and that it was thought that the loan was granted to L Company with the construction cost, and that it was a lease contract was made as if it was paid and leased a part of the lease deposit, and that it was also gathered to receive a loan from the victim Korean bank.
1. Defendant A, in collusion with J on September 26, 2012, at the O branch of the victim company located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, P, a person in charge of the loan of the deposit money, Defendant A, as the lessor Q and lessee, will pay the interest and principal of the loan if the P, a person in charge of the loan of the deposit money, proposed a lease contract in the name of the lessor Q and lessee.
“A false statement was made,” and the aforementioned lease contract concluded with Q on September 20, 2012 that the Defendant leased KRW 401,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
However, in fact, the defendant did not actually rent the above 401 and did not intend to reside, but did not think that he obtained the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the profits and did not have paid the deposit of the lease of the lease of the deposit
The defendant, in collusion with J, is a victim.