(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.12.18 2015고정898

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.12.18 2015고정898

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) called “D” restaurant located in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) around 20: (c) around May 20, 2015, the victim E (hereinafter “D”) was aware of the personnel; (d) the victim’s bridge was cut up in excess of 74 years of age; and (e) 4-5 times string the victim’s bridge; and (e) string the blue with 3-4 strings; and (e) the Defendant sustained an injury that needs to be provided for 6 weeks of medical treatment, such as the 3rd Crossing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in a written injury diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant asserts that the defendant did not have any contact with the victim's body and that the victim's injury was self-harm.

However, the victim E made a statement that the Defendant was imprisoned with her her brying while her brying, and that the witness F, who was at the present site, stated that the Defendant was her brying while her brying the victim, her brying the victim, and her brying the victim and her brying the victim, and that F, who did not have any particular interest, did not have any reason to make

In addition, G was said to be the victim who had arrived at the scene of the case late later, and G was said to be the emergency room of the hospital by leaving the unsatisfed victim to the emergency room of the hospital, and the defendant was called from the person who was at the last site to be in the emergency room of the hospital, and supported the statements of the victim and witness.

On the other hand, H, who was at the scene of the defendant, was at the investigative agency, to the effect that the victim gets out of the clothes of the defendant, while she was shakened by the defendant.

참조조문

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.06.25 2014고단358

-창원지방법원 2015.08.19 2014노2265

-수원지방법원 2016.10.19 2016노3878

-전주지방법원 2019.02.15 2017고단2415

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.02.03 2016고단1342