logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.07 2016나83374
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purpose of the entire pleadings and arguments on the statements and images set forth in Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 3.

The background of the occurrence of an accident and the payment of the insurance proceeds by the plaintiff 1) The plaintiff A vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff vehicle").

The insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle B, and the Defendant is the Defendant’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

(2) On January 2, 2016, the driver of the Defendant vehicle was in the front part of the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle, which was stopped immediately after the Defendant vehicle, in order to park on the parking path in the parking lot located in the Tae-dong, Tae-gu, Tae-dong, Daegu, Tae-dong, Daegu, and received the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle.

(3) On April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,088,60 as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident. (b) Determination of the Deliberation Committee on the Settlement of Claims for Compensation; (c) the mutual agreement on the deliberation of disputes over claims for compensation of automobile insurance (hereinafter “instant mutual agreement”) is an agreement concluded to promote the sound management and development of the insurance mutual aid business by rationally and economically resolving disputes arising between the insurer or mutual aid business operator as to the existence and scope of liability on the grounds of the liability for automobile insurance or automobile mutual aid as stipulated in the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, etc. (Article 1 of the instant mutual agreement); and (d) the key contents of the instant mutual agreement are as shown in the attached Form; and (e) the Plaintiff and the Defendant are parties to the agreement subject to the instant mutual agreement.

2) As to the instant accident with the Defendant as the appellee, the Plaintiff shall have the committee for deliberation on the disputes over indemnity established pursuant to Article 10 of the instant mutual agreement (hereinafter “Deliberation Committee”).

The review of the dispute over the claim for reimbursement was filed, and the review committee on May 30, 2016.

arrow