A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.") and the Road Traffic Act (hereafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.")

On July 8, 2013, at around 20:25, the Defendant, while proceeding in the direction of liber apartment in the direction of lurgical apartment in the direction of lurgical distance, was going to go beyond the central line.

Since there is a central line and a place where vehicle traffic is high, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle not to appear in the opposite direction beyond the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was, while proceeding in the direction of liberg apartment, received the part of the victim C (the age of 60) driving D freight front-hand part of the victim C (the age of 60) driving in the direction of liberg apartment, and again parked on the right side of the road, and received as the front-hand part of the vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as catum salt requiring treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, avoided the amount equivalent to KRW 3,088,910 of the repair cost for the passenger vehicle operated by the victim C, and even though each damaged the vehicle operated by the victim E, the Defendant immediately stopped the vehicle and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though it was damaged to the amount equivalent to KRW 1,22,100.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

The Defendant driven a car that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same place as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E, C.