1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is the defendant's successor intervenor 2,194,678 won and 1,467.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 28, 2005, a lot card Co., Ltd. filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the claim for the use of credit card by this court’s 2005da253984, and received a favorable judgment ordering the payment of the claimed amount on December 28, 2005, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

B. The claim against the Defendant was transferred on September 28, 201 to Solomon Savings Bank, Solomon Savings Bank, December 1, 201, to the Plaintiff through the Plaintiff on May 21, 2013, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor on October 30, 2015, respectively. Around that time, the claim was duly transferred to the Defendant.

[Grounds for Recognition: Each entry in Evidence A, Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. According to the above facts of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor who is the final transferee of the claim.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor is reasonable and acceptable. Since the plaintiff succeeding intervenor acquired the above claim from the plaintiff during the trial, it is decided to revise the judgment of the first instance court as stated in Paragraph 1 of this Article. It is so decided as per Disposition.