1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

G As of June 14, 2015, the facts that Plaintiff A, D, Defendant E, F, Nonparty H, and I inherited (Inheritance shares 1/7) as his/her children. G’s children were co-defendant B, A, C (hereinafter referred to as “B,” and C”) of the first instance court that died on August 21, 1989, and that Non-Party D’s respective inheritance by inheritance by inheritance by inheritance by inheritance (the shares B3/49, C, and K 2/49) are not disputed between the parties.

The plaintiffs asserts to the following purport.

① On May 27, 2005, Defendant E received respectively the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 of the Real Estate List (hereinafter “instant real estate”); on April 22, 1995, the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 of the Real Estate List No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”); and on May 7, 2015, the total amount of KRW 10 million was donated to Nonparty C and K, respectively.

② Defendant F was donated, on April 21, 1995, the real estate indicated in [Attachment Nos. 3 through 6] of the real estate list in [Attachment Nos. 3 through 6] from the G G.

③ As such, due to the Defendants’ donation from the deceased G, there was a shortage of legal reserve of inheritance among the co-inheritors of the deceased G.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to return shortage to the Plaintiffs, such as the entries in the claims.

First of all, we examine the claim against the Defendants, and examine whether the Defendants received a donation from the network G.

As to Defendant E-related part of the instant real estate No. 1, the Plaintiffs asserted that the registration of the instant real estate No. 1 was displayed on the building on the appraisal report as stipulated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table of Real Estate List (hereinafter “instant building”), and that Defendant E was donated the instant building from the deceased G.

In this case, each statement of evidence Nos. 5, 11, Eul, Eul, 9, 10, 11, and 12 (including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the whole purport of the argument as a result of the request for appraisal of the appraiser L of the first instance court is added.