logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.12 2020고단6148
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant assaulted the victim B on June 7, 2020, around 18:50, on the second floor of “D” store located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim B (n, 29 years old), followed by the victim B (n, b, 29 years old), and the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

2. Around June 27, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the victim in a way that the victimized party’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

3. Around June 27, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F against the victim: (a) on the street in front of the G ATM Switzerland located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 27, 2020; (b) on the other hand, the Defendant was forced to avoid escape from her husband F ( South, 31 years old) of E, who observed a site where he spreads the urine to E, such as the statement in paragraph (2), to prevent him from departing until the police arrives; (c) on the victim’s face, he sprinked tobacco smoke, spspspates, and attempts to take the face with drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of B and F;

112 A report processing table, response to requests for appraisal and written appraisal; and

1. The investigation report (specific suspect identity), investigation report (the discovery of liquid frame, the hearing of suspect's statement), investigation report (explosion CCTV analysis) [the defendant alleged that he did not spit in the victim F face. However, according to the above evidence, the spitation of spits towards the victim's face is recognized, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the defendant.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow