logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.26 2018구합20827
골재선별파쇄신고수리취소처분등 취소
Text

1. Although the Defendant stated the purport of the claim against the Plaintiff on December 14, 2017 by the Defendant’s complaint against the Plaintiff on December 15, 2017, the claim is stated as December 15, 2017, Party A.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff’s report on the selection and crushing of aggregate 1) The Plaintiff entered into a contract on September 12, 2017 with the company engaged in aggregate extraction, manufacture, and sale, aggregate extraction, wholesale, and transportation, etc., and with B on February 3, 2017, to purchase rocks generated in the process of tunnel excavation, etc. in the central line C-D construction site from the central line C-D construction site, and from the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of 210,000 cubic meters and the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building.

3) At the time of the above repair notification, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the repair notification stating that “In the event of civil petitions, such as the receipt of a group civil petition and written petition after the notification of the repair under Article 30 (1) of the Aggregate Extraction Act, the notification will be made prior to the implementation of the main project, and the traffic, environment, field management, and quality control to prevent any subsequent civil petitions.” (B) The Plaintiff entered into a contract with Gman on November 1, 2017 to purchase from the said company the cancer history of 543,424 square meters generated at the site of the central line line C-D Happot Construction Work.

2) Accordingly, on November 2017, the Plaintiff changed the first report of this case to the Defendant’s “annual estimated production volume: 180,000 cubic meters” from the “annual estimated production volume: 260,000 cubic meters” to the “annual estimated production volume: 260,000 cubic meters” (hereinafter “the instant report on change”).

....

arrow