beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
It shall be returned to the victim B of subparagraph 1 (one empty landmark) of seized evidence.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 24, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on December 12, 2019.
"200 Highest 6610"
1. On March 1, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 on March 1, 2020, she thought that he/she was to have his/her own possession without following necessary procedures, such as acquiring a boom card of a new bank that was lost by the victim B; and (b) submitting it to the police station.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
2. On March 1, 2020, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, around 04:19 on March 1, 2020, when boarding a F taxi operated by the victim E in the vicinity of the Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu, and arriving in the shooting distance prior to G hotel in Yongsan-gu Seoul, and paying 14,00 won to the victim, who is a taxi driver, using another person’s physical card lost by presenting a new bank card acquired, as described in paragraph (1), and acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of children who were provided with the taxi transport service from the victim, as described in paragraph (1). From around that time to 12:17 of the same day, the Defendant illegally used the other person’s physical card acquired as described in paragraph (1) seven times as shown in attached Table 1, and acquired the total amount of 78,500 won from the victims.
3. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, and the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, at the I convenience store located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul on March 1, 2020, presented it to the victim J as if he was the lawful holder of the check-up card, and attempted to acquire the goods equivalent to KRW 117,200 of the market price from the victim as if he was the lawful holder of the check-up card. However, the Defendant failed to settle the account due to the shortage of the balance of the check-up account and did not lead to the attempted crime.