Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Around March 20, 2019, the Defendant received the word “11% low interest rate lending,” which was transmitted to Defendant’s mobile phone, and made a telephone call with the person asserting himself/herself as C’s agent or D’s E division. The Defendant, who asserts himself/herself as an agent or E division, ought to activate the details of passbook transaction from the person claiming to be the above C’s agent or E division.

If the process of withdrawing from the account to the new account is repeated, the details of the passbook transaction is activated.

Since it is intended to make illegal loans to increase the company's 5%'s sunset, it will be notified to others.

Upon receipt of a proposal stating that “A person who asserts the above E division shall be notified of the F Bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant and sent a photograph so that he/she may confirm his/her appearance, and if the money is deposited, he/she shall be given an instruction to deliver it to the employee designated by the claimant as the above E division. On March 22, 2019, the Boscing employee, whose name is unknown, shall communicate the victim H by telephone at a place where it is unknown to the victim H, and shall be included as a recommendation only if he/she becomes aware of the eligibility requirements for loans.

If money is deposited in the personal name of the person in charge, the loan will be made.

“A false statement was made. However, the fact did not have the intent or ability to make a loan to the victim. The employee of Bosping, whose name is unknown, deceiving the victim as above, and the victim wired KRW 9.3 million to the above F Bank account under the Defendant’s name around 13:43 on the same day. The Defendant, around 14:05 on the same day, sent the amount of KRW 9.3 million to the above F Bank account under the Defendant’s name. On the same day, at around 14:05, the Defendant respondeded that “In the event a bank is asked, the Plaintiff was treated as KRW 84,360,000 as the name of the business fund by the Plaintiff, with the thickness of the Plaintiff’s low-income customer who was 84,000,000 won, and then, the Defendant released KRW 9 million to the Bank.