A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 12, 201, the Defendant against the victim B is the head of the office of the F attorney-at-law office in respect of the victim B (58 years old) in that he/she was meat of the operation of D located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul.

In relation to the debt problem of the party, the term "the attorney-at-law shall be appointed........... 2 million won shall be paid."

However, the defendant did not have worked as the head of the F attorney-at-law office, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to appoint a lawyer.

The Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and acquired 2 million won from the victim to the account of G name bank (Korean H) with which the Defendant was the former wife of the Defendant.

2. Fraud against victim D;

A. On September 21, 201, the Defendant borrowed KRW 500,000,00 as money is urgently required at the office now to the victim D in light of the meat E operation of the victim D as indicated in paragraph (1) around September 21, 201.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no particular income.

On September 21, 201, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 500,000 won from the victim to the bank account of G person G who is the former domicile of the defendant on September 21, 201.

B. On October 26, 2011, the Defendant posted a phone call to the victim D, and made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant borrowed 500,000 won from the past and repaid 1.6 million won in addition to the previous loan.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed money from the victim D due to the lack of special income.

Around October 26, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1.6 million from the victim to the bank account of G name G, the former domicile of the Defendant, from the victim, and acquired it by remittance.

3. The criminal defendant against the victim I is the victim I, as described in paragraph 1 of around November 21, 201.