logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2018.10.11 2018허5174
거절결정(상)
Text

1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on July 9, 2015 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) International registration number 1) international registration number / International registration date of this case: Marks No. 1151808/ 11808/1. 28/2013: 3) Designated Goods: The Category 10 Medical Cthetheters urgaling in used in margaling

나. 선등록상표들 1) 선등록상표 1 가) 등록번호/ 출원일/ 등록일: 상표등록 제590714호/ 2003. 2. 11./ 2004. 8. 20. 나) 표장: 다) 지정상품: 상품류 구분 제10류의 카데타, 대정맥 및 혈액용 필터(vena cava and blood filters) 라) 등록권리자: 코디스 코포레이션 2) 선등록상표 2 가) 등록번호/ 출원일/ 등록일: 상표등록 제729690호/ 2007. 2. 21./ 2007. 11. 30. 나) 표장: 다) 지정상품: 상품류 구분 제10류의 장(腸)관급식용 세트(안전과 올바른 사용을 위하여 장관급식용 펌프가 급식세트를 확인하도록 도와주는 연결장치를 포함하는 것-enteral feeding sets having a connector device to help identify the feeding set to an enteral feeding pump for providing safety and proper use) 라) 등록권리자: 코비디엔 아게

C. 1) The Plaintiff’s trademark for the application of international registration of this case (hereinafter “instant application trademark”)

(2) On November 19, 2013, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office notified the grounds for rejection that “the trademark applied for registration of this case falls under Article 7(1)7 of the Trademark Act because the trademark applied for registration of this case is similar to the registered trademark, the mark, and the designated goods.” (2) On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted an opinion on the above grounds for rejection. However, on June 1, 2014, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office rejected the said grounds for rejection on the same grounds.

3) On September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Intellectual Property Tribunal for a trial of dissatisfaction against the foregoing decision of refusal (2014 won 5540, but the Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal decided July 9, 2015, the trademark applied for registration of this case is similar to the trademark applied for prior trademark 1, mark, and designated goods, and Article 7 of the Trademark Act.

arrow