1. The Defendants each of KRW 14,723,435 and each of them to the Plaintiff from March 10, 2015 to June 25, 2015.

1. As to the lawsuit of this case against the Defendants, since the Plaintiff, as to the determination of this safety defense, obtained a loan from the financial business entity under the guarantee of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, and the Plaintiff, as a joint guarantor of the above credit guarantee contract of the Plaintiff, subrogated for the loan, and the Plaintiff, as a joint guarantor of the non-party company's credit guarantee contract, subrogated for the non-party company's indemnity liability against the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, as to the lawsuit of this case, the Defendants agreed to have exclusive jurisdiction over the "court having jurisdiction over the address of the company where the dispute arises due to this contract" between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, so the lawsuit of this case is unlawful in violation of the above jurisdiction.

The lawsuit of this case is merely a dispute concerning the claim of indemnity based on the relationship of joint and several liability between the plaintiff and the defendants, and it cannot be seen as a dispute related to the partnership agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants, and therefore the defendants' defense is without merit.

2. Basic facts

A. On August 18, 2010, the non-party company and the Defendants jointly and severally guaranteed the non-party company’s indemnity liability that may arise when the non-party company borrowed KRW 36 million from the valley branch of Han Bank from August 18, 2010 to August 17, 2011.

B. After that, the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund paid the loan to the non-party company in arrears, it subrogated the non-party company's loan liability of KRW 35,969,54 on March 9, 2015, and the Plaintiff on March 9, 2015, in response to the claim for reimbursement from the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund for the principal and delay damages, etc.