logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.10.25 2018고합42
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is between the victim B (n, 14 years of age) who is a juvenile of the child and the first space.

On October 11, 2017, the Defendant 17:00, the Defendant was seated in the side of the victim waiting for the bus at the D adjacent bus stops located in C at the following following following the end of November 11, 2017, and the victim “(s) is a university student”;

Does high school students;

wherever the school attends a school

The victim shall be asked as "(1)" and the victim shall be asked as "(2) of the middle school and E(2)", and the victim shall continue to see whether he/she is a male-gu dead person;

several times or Does Does Does

“A” walkes the horses, “A”, etc., and demands the victim to enter the name and contact details of the victim by making the victim’s cell phone, and after demanding the victim to enter the name and contact details of the victim’s cell phone, the victim’s right bridge bucks 4 to 5 times, and the victim gets off the victim’s right bridge bucks, and 2 to 3 times the victim’s bucks and the victim’s bucks were sent back to the victim’s side.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a juvenile.

2. The accused and his defense counsel’s arguments do not constitute an indecent act by force against the victim as stated in the facts charged.

3. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to have a judge conviction that the facts charged are true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant as the benefit of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9633, Nov. 11, 2010). In particular, if the defendant consistently denies the facts charged and the victim's statement is the only evidence that conforms to the facts charged in the record, and the victim's statement is the only evidence that conforms to the facts charged, the authenticity and accuracy of such statement is

arrow