logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.29 2018고단3575
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall lend any access medium with the knowledge that it is intended to use it for a crime or use it for the purpose of receiving, demanding, or promising to receive, demand, or promise any access medium and lend it to another person with the knowledge that it is intended to use it for a crime.

1. On February 21, 2018, Defendant A knew that a deposit account in the name of the Defendant was used for an offense, such as illegal gambling money entry and withdrawal, from a person whose name the name of the illegal Internet Magaz site company is unknown, in order to carry out the business of raising illegal gambling money, he/she received KRW 300,000 or KRW 600,000 per day from a person who was unable to know, and, on February 23, 2018, sent a physical card connected to the bank account (Account Number (F) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant to a person whose name is unknown using Kwiksetz’s bank account (Account Number). On the other hand, Defendant A sent the account number and password to Kakao Stockholm.

As a result, the Defendant lent access media with the knowledge that it will be used for a crime or used for a crime.

2. On February 27, 2018, Defendant B promised to receive KRW 100,000 through KRW 150,000 per day from a person whose name the name of the illegal casino company was unknown, from a person who was unable to know of the name of the illegal casino company, and sent a physical card, which is an access medium to the bank account in the name of the Defendant, to a person whose name is unknown using Kwikset’s service, and informed him of the account number and password by telephone.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as verification of withdrawals, inquiries about customer basic information, etc.;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act: Defendant A who has the option of criminal facts and sentence:

arrow