Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on July 27, 201, a summary order of a fine of two million won for the same crime at the Busan District Court on July 27, 201, two years of a suspended sentence of five months for the same crime at the same court on October 25, 201, two years of a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime at the same court on November 6, 201, and one year of a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) and for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) at the same court on November 6, 2013.

On September 15, 2015, the Defendant driven a coo vehicle in D with alcohol content of about 0.136% at the section of approximately 30 meters for the front road located in the Sogsan Intersection located in the Sogsan-dong, Busan, Seosan-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of replys to inquiries, such as criminal records, investigation reports (reports on criminal records of the same kind and attachment of written judgments of the suspect);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant has been punished several times by drinking alcohol driving, etc. on November 6, 2013 and is currently under the suspension of the execution of one-year imprisonment with labor for driving under drinking on November 6, 2013.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant moved most of the distance from drinking on the day of the instant case to the destination by proxy, and almost all the distance to the destination, sent a substitute driver to the destination, and the Defendant was prevented from driving a vehicle at a 30-meter level while driving on the parking lot, and that it was confirmed through surrounding CCTV data, etc., a fine shall be imposed.