1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff et al. is a transport employee who actually engages in the relevant driving service by a private taxi transport business entity that operates the passenger transport business with a private taxi of all individuals.

B. On June 24, 2015, Daegu Metropolitan City sent a public notice to the head of the Gu and the president of the Daegu Metropolitan City Private Passenger Transport Business Association, etc. on the title “ thoroughly establishing order in taxi operation, such as the Dong zone,” and there is a civil petition regarding illegal stopping of a taxi and the act of disturbing order in taxi riding in the surrounding areas of multiple-use facilities such as the Dong zone. As such, the head of the Gu strengthens the crackdown and instructs each union’s president to instruct each union members.

C. On the road in front of the square of the Gyeong-dong Zone, a taxi is installed at a point 40 meters away from the crosswalk, and at that point, taxi and passengers are waiting for passengers to board the taxi on December 16, 2015. The Plaintiff is waiting for passengers on board the crosswalk. On November 23, 2015, 16:4:16, 17:46, 205, 11:49, 11:49, 11:0, 18, 200, 11:07, 200, and 10:14,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000:0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

(hereinafter “each act of riding”). D.

During the period from December 23, 2015 to January 22, 2016, the Defendant imposed each of the instant dispositions on the Plaintiff, etc. pursuant to Articles 21, 85, and 88 of the former Passenger Transport Service Act (amended by Act No. 12982, Jan. 6, 2015; hereinafter “former Passenger Transport Service Act”) and Article 46 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Passenger Transport Service Act (amended by Act No. 12982, Jan. 7, 2016; hereinafter “former Passenger Transport Service Act”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiff.