logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.06.05 2020고단265
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend a means of access used in an electronic financial transaction while receiving, demanding or promising any consideration therefor.

Nevertheless, around November 19, 2019, the Defendant called a name-free person who assumes the staff of the liquor company in the Defendant’s residence located in the Gunsan-si B, and called “3 million won in return for the use of 3 days” from the name-free person who assumes the position of the liquor company. At around 10:20 of the same month, the Defendant, at around 10:20 of the same month, provided one physical card connected to the Cbank’s account (D) in the Defendant’s name in the Defendant’s residence.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to provide compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. E’s written petition;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of seized materials);

1. Financial transaction statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (such as: (a) the fact that there is no benefit that the defendant actually acquired by committing the instant crime; (b) the defendant reflects his wrong and repents his wrong; and (c) the defendant has no criminal power to commit the instant crime);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;

arrow