The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The finding of guilt in a criminal trial shall be based on evidence with probative value sufficient for a judge to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true, and if there is no such proof, even if there is no doubt of guilt against the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001; 2005Do8675, Mar. 9, 2006). Furthermore, the selection of evidence and the probative value of evidence conducted as a premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). The court below rejected the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor, recognizing that there is no proof of crime in the facts of this case and the first trial judgment that acquitted the defendant is justifiable, on the grounds as stated in its reasoning.

The allegation in the grounds of appeal is the purport of disputing such determination of facts by the lower court, and is merely an error of the lower court’s determination on the selection and probative value of evidence, which substantially belongs to the free judgment of the fact-finding court. In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the above legal doctrine and the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the free evaluation principle against logical

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.