The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. Around August 7, 2016, around 22:30 on August 7, 2016, the Defendant sold 6 enlisted a week to the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Building and D main points in the first floor to juveniles E (n, 18 years old) and 4 others.

2. Determination

A. From the investigative agency to this court, the Defendant confirmed that he was not a minor, through his resident registration certificate of F, G, H, I, and E (hereinafter “F, etc.”) and sold alcoholic beverages. If F, etc. is found to be a minor, the Defendant asserted that F, etc. presented another person’s resident registration certificate or forged resident registration certificate to the Defendant.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the statements of F, etc., who correspond to the facts charged, are difficult to believe as they are. Rather, the Defendant appears to have fulfilled his duty to verify the age of F, etc. and sold alcohol, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged.

1) The F et al. stated in the same manner that “The Defendant did not separately verify the age of two persons during his/her work, and requested only the remaining three persons to present a credit card.” However, two persons who did not verify the age, or three persons who presented a credit card, who presented a credit card, are different statements.

2) The F et al. submitted three copies of the card with a credit card, etc. presented by three persons who received a request for age verification upon being investigated by the police on the day of the instant case. Specifically, there is no statement about who presented any card, and the police officer did not investigate the card.

3) Since F, etc. did not issue credit cards to minors, F, etc. presented credit cards to the Defendant to the extent that they are not minors.

One of the arguments, the defendant's person for drinking time.