logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.11.15 2018고단2838
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. From 00:30 on June 6, 2018 to 01:00, the Defendant: (a) without any reason, during the period of drinking alcohol within the main points of “D” operated by Ulsan-gu B and the victim C, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties, she is female customers “Isk for drinking alcohol within this hour.”

The victim interfered with the restaurant business of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as taking a bath, etc.

2. The Defendant: (a) destroyed property, at the time and place of paragraph 1, three the tables, carried as hand, destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 283,00,00 in total, including the market price of the victim’s mobile phone volume (the market price of KRW 93,00), and the portable gas burner (the market price of KRW 40,00), and the market price of KRW 283,00 in total (the market price of KRW 50,00).

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report at the time, at the place, paragraph 1 and 12 and soliciting F to calculate the drinking value and return home to the Defendant by the head of Ulsann Police Station E District by the Ulsann Police Station E District, which was dispatched to the site, the Defendant “I am present at the time, and I am.”

존나 빡 치게 하네 ”라고 하며 손으로 F의 멱살을 잡아 흔들어 상의 경찰복 단추가 뜯어 지게 하고, 수회 발길질을 하여 다리 부위를 걷어찼다.

The defendant was arrested as a current offender of interference with duties, etc., and was to go on the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and the left hand of G in the background leading up to the seat was broken down as soon as possible.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, G, and F;

1. Each statement of H, I, J, and K;

1. Photographs, on-site images, and estimates;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314 (1), Article 366, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade (Article 3 of the Judgment)

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act:

arrow