The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at a drinking house where the trade name in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul is unknown, the victim E (n, 21 years old); (b) fluor and fluor; (c) fluor, the so-called so-called the subject of the so-called “fluor” facing the Defendant around 22:0 of the same month; and (d) facing the Defendant into the Gelel 505 room in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul

피고인은 같은 날 10:00경 위 모텔 505호실에서, 잠에서 깬 후 자신의 옆에서 술에 취하여 자고 있던 피해자를 발견하고 피해자의 옷을 벗긴 후 피해자의 성기를 혀로 핥고, 손가락을 피해자의 성기에 넣고 수회 넣었다가 빼는 행위를 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed similar rape by taking advantage of the victim’s non-performance state of difficulty.

2. The gist of the Defendant’s lawsuit is that the Defendant understood that he had sexual intercourse by doing his act, such as bringing the victim who was enjoying in the telecom with the Defendant’s talks, and included his fingers in the victim’s sexual intercourse as part of one’s duty.

The victim did not have to resist at the time, and the victim did not have to do so.

3. Determination

가. 피해자는 경찰 이래 공판에 이르기까지 “모텔에서 잠을 자다가 깨었을 때 피고인이 성기를 핥고 그 안에 손가락을 넣는 행동 등을 하고 있었다. 피고인에게 그만하라고 하였으나 피고인은 ‘이래도 그만해’라고 하면서 위 행동을 계속하였고, 몸을 떨면서 ‘제발 그만하라’고 하자 행동을 멈추었다”고 일관되게 진술하고 있어, 피고인이 피해자의 항거불능 상태를 이용하여 유사강간한 것이 아닌가 하는 의심이 들기는 한다.

B. However, in light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by various evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the victim’s statement, the direct evidence of this part of the facts charged, is difficult to believe, and the Defendant’s sexual character is the victim.