Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person working as a shipping agent for the collection vehicle of laundry in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council for the Settlement of Disputes, and the victim D (27 tax) was a workplace club relationship with the defendant on board the same vehicle as the defendant and working as a shipping assistant, and is a disabled person who is a grade 2 (in short of judgment capacity) with intellectual and inter-public disability.

1. On January 20, 2015, the Defendant: “The Defendant is unable to open a mobile phone under his/her own name” from “ Samsung Digital Flaer,” which is located in the Ulsan-gu Pharmaceuticaldong around Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu. In doing so, when galloning Samsung ju, he/she shall open one stamp and use it as a main house and pay the use fee and installment each month normally.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay mobile phone charges and installments.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim do so in the name of the victim, and had the victim do so over 512,200 won in the name of the victim, and received one stamp in the name of Samsung Gallon.

2. On February 6, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “G” located in Ulsan-gu F, Ulsan-gu, that “The Defendant sold the two mobile phones to the victim with the cellphones in the main face of the mobile phone and repaid the same with the cellphones.”

However, in fact, the victim did not have any intention or ability to fully repay the damage caused by his/her own dynamics by selling the cell phone which the victim opened with the cell phone.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had him open only one Soviet 4 mobile phone unit and one Soviet 802,000 won at the above place, at the 692,00 won H Samsung Galle ju, and received delivery from him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on copies of police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;