logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.11.06 2020가단528672
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 40,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 10% per annum from February 26, 2019 to July 21, 2020; and (b).

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for claims in attached Form;

(However, “creditor” and “debtor” shall be based on the judgment deemed to be a confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. The Defendant submitted a written objection with the delivery of a payment order. However, the said written objection is merely stated in the purport of objection against the payment order, but the said written objection does not include specific details of the Plaintiff’s claim, and thus, the said written objection cannot be deemed as a reply pursuant to Article 256 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The defendant did not submit the documents that indicate the defendant's assertion, such as the written reply or the briefs, to the effect that the defendant will submit the documents stating a practical answer.

The defendant did not appear on the designated date for pleading even after being notified of legitimate date.

After all, the defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of the facts alleged in the annexed sheet.

arrow